June 19, 2013 2011 Issue 8  
Case Search Database Link
DRI Resources
    
 

 

Join the DRI Community

    

In This Issue
Plan to Join Us in D.C. and NYC
Build Your Practice, Build Your Network
ALABAMA
CALIFORNIA
DELAWARE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
ILLINOIS
LOUISIANA
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
OHIO
PENNSYLVANIA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
Tangible vs. Intangible Damage: What Does First-Party Property Insurance Cover?
The Assignee Wants a New Pair of Shoes
Looking Forward, Looking Back: A Short Treatment of Insurance Issues Arising from the 2005 Hurricane Season
Will Misrepresentation Claims Be Covered by CGL Policies?
Lafayette v. Peerboom: A Case Study nn What Constitutes “That Particular Part” Under Exclusion J (5) and (6)
Seminar Information

Committee Leadership

 

Committee Chair
Michael M. Marick
Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson
(312) 474-7888
michael.marick@mbtlaw.com

Committee Vice Chair
Audrey A. Seeley
Hurwitz & Fine
(716) 849-8900
aas@hurwitzfine.com
 
Editor
Bryan M. Weiss
Murchison & Cumming
bweiss@murchisonlaw.com
 
Co-Editor
Wen-Shin Cheng
Tressler LLP
(312) 627-4181
wcheng@tresslerllp.com
             
Editor
Tiffany M. Brown
Meagher & Geer
(612) 371-1324
tbrown@meagher.com

 
Co-Editor
Shanda Pearson
Bassford Remele
(612) 376-1679
spearson@bassford.com

 
Editor
Elaine Murphy Pohl
Plunkett Cooney
(248) 901-4000
 
Co-Editor
Patrick B. Omilian
Goldberg Segalla
 

Editor
Suzanne Young Whitehead
Zelle McDonough & Cohen
(617) 742-6250
Co-Editor
Stevi Raab
Sedgwick LLP
(212) 422-0202
 
 


   Seminars

 
June 5-7, 2013
Boston, Massachusetts
 

DRI Publications   

http://dri.org/bookstore_icons/DLS-icon.jpg

Professional Liability Insurance: A Compendium of State Law

 

 Print to PDF

Recent Case Law Updates
ALABAMA

ALABAMA—First Party Hurricane Coverage
 
The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled in Farr v. The Gulf Agency (Ala., June 17, 2011) that tort claims brought by an aggrieved insured for damage to his house in Hurricane Ivan were barred by Alabama's two-year statute of limitations.  The court rejected the insured's argument that the statute of limitations was tolled by Lexington's agreement to make a partial payment to him or by ongoing discussions in the interim.  Further, the Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's dismissal of the insured's claims for breach of contract, as there was no evidence to support his assertion that the insurers agreed to increase his policy limits before his house was completely destroyed.  On the other hand, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court's entry of summary judgment for Lexington with respect to the insured's claim for $20,000 in contents coverage, finding that Lexington had not opposed this issue on appeal and that it must therefore be remanded for resolution. 
 
Michael Aylward
Morrison Mahoney
Boston, MA
 
ALABAMA—First Party Property/Bad Faith
 
The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that a trial court erred in awarding bad faith damages against a property insurer based upon its refusal to pay a theft claim where the undisputed evidence was that the policy in question had been cancelled for underwriting reasons prior to the loss and that the insured had received statutory notice of the cancellation within the required period of time. In Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. J-Mar Machine & Pump, Inc., 1090685 (Ala., June 17, 2011), the Supreme Court further ruled that the insurer had not waived its right to assert cancellation by accepting a belated check from the insured for the premium due, as the undisputed evidence was that the insurer had only kept a portion of the check for the premium due through the date of cancellation and had refunded the rest.
 
Michael Aylward
Morrison Mahoney
Boston, MA

Back...